Educational and Industrial Drawing: Mechanical Series, No. 1 (Drawing book with student work)
Softcover wraps, 9 x 12 inches. Introductory remarks dated 1893. 18 pages of text interleaved with 8 leaves/16 pages of blank heavyweight drawing paper. All of the blank pages are filled with original student drawings, most subdivided into 4 or 6 panels. The examples are based on text prompts and models with minimal copying. One page has a small tear at the bottom edge, a few areas of offsetting from loosely inserted scrap paper, otherwise VG+ with minor soil and handling wear. A robust example with well-executed work. The student's name has been erased from the cover, just faintly reading Ernestine A. ---?
Langdon Shook Thompson presented his "Educational and Industrial System of Drawing" as an experienced guide through others' methodologies, not as an original invention of his own. He published an arguably dizzying number of series and variations: the Common School Course consisted of four drawing books and a manual for primary grades, plus three "Model and Object Drawing" books and a manual. Advanced courses were offered in Manual Training (2 manuals), Advanced Free Hand (4 drawing books), Aesthetic (6 drawing books and a manual), and Mechanical (6 drawing books and a manual). With some mix-and-match elements, Thompson endeavored to cover bases in terms of schools' varying intentions for art education. "Model and Object Drawing" series books could be substituted for the early numbers in both the Aesthetic and Mechanical Series, evidence of the diverging purposes for art education between schools. In 1898, Thompson was appointed Chairman of the National Education Association Committee of Ten, a group of art educators chosen to deliberate on elementary art education's means and proper purpose. Thompson's report, issued in 1902, concluded that beauty and aesthetics was more important than pictorial representation--though it was published with dissenting remarks from other committee members, including John S. Clark. ('The Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the National Educational Association,' 1902, p594-614)